Antinatalism Copycats

Here is a breakdown of the facets of Antinatalism and Natalism. Note that the facets of these 2 concepts are neither symmetrical nor identical. This results in "mirror matches / argument copycats" always producing something interesting.

This is especially useful if natalists start making easy, cheap, hypocritical or pseudo-intellectual arguments. If the argument ever becomes glib, lazy, or unfair, antinatalists can very successfully mirror match it:

Negatives Do Not Justify Ending Life
Then positives do not justify starting it.

Antinatalism Has No E = mc2 For Its Philosophy
Natalism is utterly void of this "requirement",

Antinatalism Can't Prove X Has Objective Value
Natalism also lacks all of this -- they have neither a mathematical equation nor an objective proof demonstrating why life inherently good, or desirable, or preferable to never living. Nor have they demonstrated that life is ever accomplishing anything - or even has the possibility to.

And yet natalism is the one that started the entire presupposition that life should exist, so they have all burden of proof and explanation regardless. But natalism completely jumped the evidence before starting life. Antinatalism isn' t doing tu quoque here -- natalism has shifted the burden of proof and jumped the evidence -- antinatalism is finally calling the bluff.

Antinatalism Can't Prove Pain Outweighs Pleasure
Natalism can't prove there's a sane reason to create ''either pleasure or pain, so they fail on both counts. Meaning: '' Natalism still can't demonstrate why either one of them should keep existing. This is yet another deeper truth.
 * 1) No matter how pleasurable pleasure is
 * 2) No matter how painful pain is

Antinatalism 's case doesn't even rely  on proving suffering or pleasure is more weighted.

However, it can certainly be logically demonstrated that life's negatives have the edge in all metrics, for even more proof natalism's case is extremely bleak and foolhardy.

DNA/Nature/Life Worship VS. Death Worship
The problem with this parallel is that "death" isn't something that can brainwash. You can't follow an edict, presupposition, false premise, fallacy, dogma, or program that was installed inside you by death. All of such following is installed by DNA, which gets to the point that DNA life also has the monopoly on every conceivable brainwash.

Once you examine the cards, which are always maintaining any sort of presuppositional dogma:

Nature-Worship, DNA-Worship, Life-Worship, Pleasure-Worship, Pain-Worship, Self-Worship, Existence-Worship

then stop to look at these cards:

Non-worship, Non-presupposition, Non-dogma

Antinatalism and Efilism can just be embodied and predicated as the "non" cards, meaning it can be simply accomplished by no longer supposing that anything ought to exist, or that anything ever ought to be, ever again, and sentient life would cease to exist.

This proves that even if the Is/Ought arguments were unsolvable, and if all sides must surrender all deonticarguments, AN/EFIL can completely surrender that territory and succeed, while Natalism ultimately folds and says goodbye.

This proves that Is/Ought and deontics are an utterly irrelevant counter-argument to Antinatalism and Efilism, and all they could do is eliminate Natalism.

Antinatalists are eugenicists that think they have the right to choose who breeds
Natalists are frankensteins that think they have the right to create torture. On a serious note, antinatalism isn't "selective breeding" or "discrimination breeding" - it's "anti breeding". Anybody who equivocates antinatalism and eugenic s is either a duplicitous liar, or oblivious to any real nuance in the world and should never be trying to do philosophy or argumentation.

Another self-defeating irony is the fact that natalism selectively breeds, and breeds discriminatorily, all the time. That's what the entire biological function of breeding is built out of, it's selective and discriminatory breeding.

Antinatalists Simply Have A Negativity Bias
Natalists have a fundamentally irrational "existence bias", which is being philosophically dismantled.

Antinatalism doesn't require any negative bias whatsoever -- it can just point out the remarkable intellectual bankruptcy in the whole "mission" DNA has contrived for you:

Life is caught on a hedonic treadmill, chasing an impossible goal of ultimate satisfaction, designed by a DNA molecule that never cared about life.

DNA created every conceivable pain, harm and torture - yet natalists are deceived by DNA programming into believing there's a utopia or amusement park being offered by this thing.

The only real "utopia" is the peaceful harm-free problem-free state, that results from the absence of DNA. The disaster of every conceivable pain, harm, problem and torture... would be the state life is now.

And here's the punchline: The peaceful harm-free problem-free benign state of "DNA's absence", is something DNA deceives you into believing is the worst possible outcome. Give some long deep thought to that third part, because apparently DNA's twisted function actually short-circuits the natalist brain when they realize this. Because natalists pretend to accept the risk of every conceivable harm, then later on, they act surprised when it hits them and everyone they bred into this. That's a severe case of amnesia... and logic-twisting... and reckless self-sabotage.
 * 1) First, by programming you with a fundamentally irrational existence bias
 * 2) Second, with that vacuous treadmill of non-benevolent non-gratutious pleasure it's offering you
 * 3) Third, by making death as agonizing as possible

When reality comes knocking on the door, natalists are anything but fine with what they got themselves into. But it's too late to be rational by that point. It' s too late to tell you that you were gamed by a biological molecule that never cared, and that maybe Mr. Negativity Bias was onto something.